Opinion
Judicial Overreach vs. Legislative Integrity: The Case Of Senator Natasha Akpoti-Uduaghan
By Engr Ike Chidolue
The separation of powers is the bedrock of democratic governance, ensuring that the executive, legislative, and judicial branches operate within their constitutional mandates without overreach. The judiciary interprets the law, the executive enforces it, and the legislature creates and regulates laws within its domain. When any branch exceeds its authority, the delicate balance of governance is disrupted, eroding the very foundation of democratic institutions.
The case of Senator Natasha Akpoti-Uduaghan raises critical concerns about judicial interference in legislative affairs. At issue is whether an ex parte order—issued without hearing all parties—should dictate the internal processes of the Senate. The Senate, as an autonomous legislative body, has established mechanisms such as the Ethics Committee to investigate and adjudicate concerns among its members. Allowing courts to preemptively interfere in these internal processes before they are exhausted undermines the principle of self-governance and sets a dangerous precedent.
Beyond the legal framework, this case presents a broader institutional challenge: should external forces dictate how a legislative body governs itself? The Senate is not merely a forum for political debate but a constitutional institution with the authority to regulate its members and legislative proceedings. If this authority is diminished by unchecked judicial intervention, it opens the door for future manipulation of legislative processes by external interests, weakening democratic governance and institutional stability.
Moreover, the public discourse surrounding this case highlights a troubling trend: the increasing reliance on media narratives and external pressure to influence institutional processes. While transparency and accountability are essential in any democracy, they must not override due process and institutional integrity. The deliberate escalation of such disputes beyond legislative mechanisms may not be a quest for justice but rather an attempt to delegitimize the Senate’s authority.
This is not just about an individual senator—it is a litmus test for the resilience of democratic institutions. If the judiciary can issue directives that circumvent internal legislative processes, what remains of the Senate’s independence? If ex parte orders can dictate Senate affairs, what prevents similar intrusions into parliamentary deliberations, voting outcomes, or disciplinary actions? The separation of powers must be preserved—not just as a legal doctrine, but as a fundamental safeguard against institutional encroachment and the slow erosion of governance itself.
The Senate must assert its authority, ensuring that its internal processes remain intact, its constitutional role remains undiminished, and its responsibilities to the people remain unshaken. Only by maintaining this balance can democracy thrive—free from undue interference and institutional overreach.
Conclusion
While every claim deserves thorough consideration, the sanctity of separation of powers must be upheld to ensure that each branch of government functions within its constitutional limits. This is not just about legislative independence—it is about the preservation of democratic principles. The judiciary must not allow itself to become an instrument of political influence, nor should legislative processes be dictated by external forces.
Democracy cannot flourish where institutions undermine one another rather than complementing their distinct roles. Preserving legislative integrity is not an act of defiance against accountability—it is a defense of the democratic order itself.
Engr Ike Chidolue is the immediate past Texas State Chairman, Nigeria-American Public Affairs Committee, (NAPAC USA)
Send Us A Press Statement Advertise With Us Contact Us
And For More Nigerian News Visit GWG.NG
