Akeredolu’s Legacy: Untold Reasons Betty Is Fighting Aiyedatiwa

Betty Anyanwu-Akeredolu’s ongoing strained relationship with Lucky Aiyedatiwa, the current governor of Ondo State, has raised several questions among observers.

While the full reasons behind her actions remain unclear, her public remarks and behavior toward him suggest a deep-seated tension that goes beyond the typical dynamics of a predecessor’s family and a successor.

One of the most notable recent instances of this tension surfaced when Betty openly criticized the state’s planned memorial lecture for her late husband, Rotimi Akeredolu.

Although the event was intended to honor his memory, Betty expressed strong disapproval, claiming her family had not been involved in the planning. Her comments on social media, where she labeled the event as a “419” scheme and accused Aiyedatiwa of using her husband’s legacy for personal gain, highlighted the clear rift between the two.

Betty’s dismissal of the memorial lecture as “propaganda” and her refusal to acknowledge its significance show her dissatisfaction with Aiyedatiwa’s actions, even in matters meant to celebrate her late husband.

However, this incident is just one of many that reflect Betty’s antagonistic stance toward Aiyedatiwa. The roots of their strained relationship can be traced back to the internal family and political conflicts that surfaced during Rotimi Akeredolu’s illness.

It is widely believed that Betty felt a sense of betrayal, especially from those within her family and political circle who supported Aiyedatiwa during this time. Betty’s harsh criticism of her late husband’s niece, Funke Akeredolu Aruna, for supporting Aiyedatiwa in the governorship primaries, calling her a “bloody serpent,” revealed the depth of the divisions within the family. This personal conflict, intertwined with political ambitions, has likely contributed to Betty’s ongoing tension with Aiyedatiwa.

Despite Aiyedatiwa’s rise to the governorship being a natural political transition, Betty’s public reaction suggests that she may view his ascension as a challenge to her late husband’s legacy. The emotional weight of losing her husband, compounded by what she perceives as a betrayal by those who supported Aiyedatiwa, may have shaped her negative stance toward him. In her eyes, Aiyedatiwa’s actions, particularly his political rise, may not have been in line with the respect she believes her husband deserved.

It is important to note that Betty’s behavior toward Aiyedatiwa has not been exclusively about his actions as governor. Her criticisms appear to stem from a broader sense of personal and political betrayal. The tension between the two is not just political but deeply rooted in personal matters and family dynamics, which makes it difficult to pinpoint a singular reason for Betty’s current approach to Aiyedatiwa.

What could be the reason behind Betty’s actions? Is it purely political, personal, or a mix of both? Only time may reveal the full extent of their conflict, but the public nature of Betty’s comments, particularly her criticisms of Aiyedatiwa’s efforts to honor her late husband, suggests that there is far more at play than just political rivalry.

Send Us A Press Statement Advertise With Us Contact Us

 And For More Nigerian News Visit GWG.NG